The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior TR Tyler, SL Blader Personality and social psychology review 7 (4), 349-361, 2003 | 3134 | 2003 |
Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement T Tyler, S Blader Routledge, 2013 | 2700 | 2013 |
Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. SL Blader, TR Tyler Journal of applied psychology 94 (2), 445, 2009 | 1286 | 2009 |
A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process SL Blader, TR Tyler Personality and social psychology bulletin 29 (6), 747-758, 2003 | 876 | 2003 |
Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings TR Tyler, SL Blader Academy of management journal 48 (6), 1143-1158, 2005 | 707 | 2005 |
Identity and cooperative behavior in groups TR Tyler, SL Blader Group processes & intergroup relations 4 (3), 207-226, 2001 | 681 | 2001 |
Differentiating the effects of status and power: a justice perspective. SL Blader, YR Chen Journal of personality and social psychology 102 (5), 994, 2012 | 564 | 2012 |
What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice SL Blader, TR Tyler Human Resource Management Review 13 (1), 107-126, 2003 | 417 | 2003 |
Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? TR Tyler, SL Blader Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89 (1), 813-838, 2002 | 383 | 2002 |
Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures D De Cremer, SL Blader European Journal of Social Psychology 36 (2), 211-228, 2006 | 223 | 2006 |
Looking out from the top: Differential effects of status and power on perspective taking SL Blader, A Shirako, YR Chen Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 42 (6), 723-737, 2016 | 219 | 2016 |
11 How Can Theories of Organizational justice Explain the Effects of Fairness? SL Blader, TR Tyler Handbook of organizational justice, 329-354, 2013 | 218 | 2013 |
What influences how higher-status people respond to lower-status others? Effects of procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and concerns about status SL Blader, YR Chen Organization Science 22 (4), 1040-1060, 2011 | 160 | 2011 |
What’s in a name? Status, power, and other forms of social hierarchy SL Blader, YR Chen The psychology of social status, 71-95, 2014 | 156 | 2014 |
Implicit impressions JS Uleman, SL Blader, A Todorov The new unconscious, 362-392, 2005 | 154 | 2005 |
Organizational identification and workplace behavior: More than meets the eye SL Blader, S Patil, DJ Packer Research in organizational behavior 37, 19-34, 2017 | 146 | 2017 |
What determines people’s fairness judgments? Identification and outcomes influence procedural justice evaluations under uncertainty SL Blader Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (6), 986-994, 2007 | 132 | 2007 |
The contingent effect of management practices S Blader, C Gartenberg, A Prat The Review of Economic Studies 87 (2), 721-749, 2020 | 128 | 2020 |
Are status and respect different or two sides of the same coin? SL Blader, S Yu Academy of Management Annals 11 (2), 800-824, 2017 | 123 | 2017 |
Procedural justice and retaliation in organizations: Comparing cross‐nationally the importance of fair group processes SL Bidder, CC Chang, TR Tyler International Journal of Conflict Management 12 (4), 295-311, 2001 | 115 | 2001 |