|Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making—an introduction: report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force|
P Thokala, N Devlin, K Marsh, R Baltussen, M Boysen, Z Kalo, ...
Value in health 19 (1), 1-13, 2016
|Public participation in health care priority setting: a scoping review|
C Mitton, N Smith, S Peacock, B Evoy, J Abelson
Health policy 91 (3), 219-228, 2009
|Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making—emerging good practices: report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force|
K Marsh, M IJzerman, P Thokala, R Baltussen, M Boysen, Z Kaló, ...
Value in health 19 (2), 125-137, 2016
|Allocating resources to health authorities: development of method for small area analysis of use of inpatient services.|
RA Carr-Hill, TA Sheldon, P Smith, S Martin, S Peacock, G Hardman
BMJ: British Medical Journal 309 (6961), 1046, 1994
|A formula for distributing NHS revenues based on small area use of hospital beds|
R Carr-Hill, G Hardman, S Martin, S Peacock, T Sheldon, P Smith
Centre for Health Economics, University of York Working Papers, 1994
|Allocating resources to health authorities: results and policy implications of small area analysis of use of inpatient services.|
P Smith, TA Sheldon, RA Carr-Hill, S Martin, S Peacock, G Hardman
BMJ: British Medical Journal 309 (6961), 1050, 1994
|Efficiency measurement in health and health care|
B Hollingsworth, SJ Peacock
|A randomized controlled trial of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervicalcancer screening: trial design and preliminary results (HPV FOCAL Trial)|
GS Ogilvie, DJ van Niekerk, M Krajden, RE Martin, TG Ehlen, K Ceballos, ...
BMC cancer 10 (1), 111, 2010
|Effect of screening with primary cervical HPV testing vs cytology testing on high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia at 48 months: the HPV FOCAL randomized clinical trial|
GS Ogilvie, D van Niekerk, M Krajden, LW Smith, D Cook, L Gondara, ...
Jama 320 (1), 43-52, 2018
|Overcoming barriers to priority setting using interdisciplinary methods|
S Peacock, C Mitton, A Bate, B McCoy, C Donaldson
Health policy 92 (2-3), 124-132, 2009
|Construction of the descriptive system for the assessment of quality of life AQoL-6D utility instrument|
JRJ Richardson, SJ Peacock, G Hawthorne, A Iezzi, G Elsworth, NA Day
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 10 (1), 38, 2012
|Measurement of the quality of life for economic evaluation and the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Mark 2 instrument|
J Richardson, N Atherton Day, S Peacock, A Iezzi
Australian Economic Review 37 (1), 62-88, 2004
|Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study|
MC Tammemagi, H Schmidt, S Martel, A McWilliams, JR Goffin, ...
The lancet oncology 18 (11), 1523-1531, 2017
|Primary cervical cancer screening with HPV testing compared with liquid-based cytology: results of round 1 of a randomised controlled trial–the HPV FOCAL Study|
GS Ogilvie, M Krajden, DJ Van Niekerk, RE Martin, TG Ehlen, K Ceballos, ...
British journal of cancer 107 (12), 1917-1924, 2012
|Understanding the costs of cancer care before and after diagnosis for the 21 most common cancers in Ontario: a population-based descriptive study|
C de Oliveira, KE Bremner, R Pataky, N Gunraj, K Chan, S Peacock, ...
CMAJ open 1 (1), E1, 2013
|Vision and quality of life: the development of a utility measure|
RA Misajon, G Hawthorne, J Richardson, J Barton, S Peacock, A Iezzi, ...
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 46 (11), 4007-4015, 2005
|Using economics to set pragmatic and ethical priorities|
S Peacock, D Ruta, C Mitton, C Donaldson, A Bate, M Murtagh
Bmj 332 (7539), 482-485, 2006
|Techniques for measuring efficiency in health services|
S Peacock, C Chan, M Mangolini, D Johansen
Productivity Commission: Staff Working Paper, 2001
|Priority setting in health care using multi-attribute utility theory and programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA)|
SJ Peacock, JRJ Richardson, R Carter, D Edwards
Social science & medicine 64 (4), 897-910, 2007
|Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment|
DA Regier, SJ Peacock, R Pataky, K Van Der Hoek, GP Jarvik, J Hoch, ...
Cmaj 187 (6), E190-E197, 2015