The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors T Smith, KD Stein, CC Mehta, C Kaw, JL Kepner, T Buskirk, J Stafford, ... Cancer 109 (1), 1-12, 2007 | 233 | 2007 |
Factors associated with persistence in science and engineering majors: An exploratory study using classification trees and random forests G Mendez, TD Buskirk, S Lohr, S Haag Journal of Engineering Education 97 (1), 57-70, 2008 | 173 | 2008 |
Mobile technologies for conducting, augmenting and potentially replacing surveys: Executive summary of the AAPOR task force on emerging technologies in public opinion research MW Link, J Murphy, MF Schober, TD Buskirk, J Hunter Childs, ... Public Opinion Quarterly 78 (4), 779-787, 2014 | 159 | 2014 |
Traditional and virtual microscopy compared experimentally in a classroom setting SA Scoville, TD Buskirk Clinical Anatomy: The Official Journal of the American Association of …, 2007 | 157 | 2007 |
What makes cancer survivor stories work? An empirical study among African American women MW Kreuter, TD Buskirk, K Holmes, EM Clark, L Robinson, X Si, S Rath, ... Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2, 33-44, 2008 | 147 | 2008 |
Worksite Opportunities for Wellness (WOW): effects on cardiovascular disease risk factors after 1 year SB Racette, SS Deusinger, CL Inman, TL Burlis, GR Highstein, TD Buskirk, ... Preventive medicine 49 (2-3), 108-114, 2009 | 142 | 2009 |
Apples to oranges or gala versus golden delicious? Comparing data quality of nonprobability internet samples to low response rate probability samples D Dutwin, TD Buskirk Public Opinion Quarterly 81 (S1), 213-239, 2017 | 135 | 2017 |
Smart surveys for smart phones: Exploring various approaches for conducting online mobile surveys via smartphones TD Buskirk, C Andres Survey Practice 5 (1), 2012 | 130 | 2012 |
Making mobile browser surveys smarter: results from a randomized experiment comparing online surveys completed via computer or smartphone TD Buskirk, CH Andrus Field Methods 26 (4), 322-342, 2014 | 98 | 2014 |
An introduction to machine learning methods for survey researchers TD Buskirk, A Kirchner, A Eck, CS Signorino Survey Practice 11 (1), 2018 | 75 | 2018 |
Using text messages in US mobile phone surveys C Steeh, TD Buskirk, M Callegaro Field Methods 19 (1), 59-75, 2007 | 66 | 2007 |
Finding respondents in the forest: A comparison of logistic regression and random forest models for response propensity weighting and stratification TD Buskirk, S Kolenikov Survey Methods: Insights from the Field, 1-17, 2015 | 65 | 2015 |
Effects of patient health literacy, patient engagement and a system-level health literacy attribute on patient-reported outcomes: a representative statewide survey KA Kaphingst, NL Weaver, RJ Wray, MLR Brown, T Buskirk, MW Kreuter BMC health services research 14, 1-8, 2014 | 64 | 2014 |
Surveying the forests and sampling the trees: An overview of classification and regression trees and random forests with applications in survey research TD Buskirk Survey Practice 11 (1), 2018 | 55 | 2018 |
The future of US general population telephone survey research P Lavrakas, G Benson, S Blumberg, T Buskirk, IF Cervantes, L Christian, ... AAPOR Report, 2017 | 43 | 2017 |
Asymptotic properties of kernel density estimation with complex survey data TD Buskirk, SL Lohr Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 128 (1), 165-190, 2005 | 43 | 2005 |
Big Data meets survey science: A collection of innovative methods CA Hill, PP Biemer, TD Buskirk, L Japec, A Kirchner, S Kolenikov, ... John Wiley & Sons, 2020 | 42 | 2020 |
Nonparametric statistical techniques TD Buskirk, LM Willoughby, TJ Tomazic The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods. Statistical analysis 2, 106-141, 2013 | 42 | 2013 |
Telephone vs. mail survey gives different SF-36 quality-of-life scores among cancer survivors TD Buskirk, KD Stein Journal of clinical epidemiology 61 (10), 1049-1055, 2008 | 42 | 2008 |
Are sliders too slick for surveys? An experiment comparing slider and radio button scales for smartphone, tablet and computer based surveys TD Buskirk methods, data, analyses 9 (2), 32, 2015 | 38 | 2015 |