| Text preprocessing for text mining in organizational research: Review and recommendations L Hickman, S Thapa, L Tay, M Cao, P Srinivasan Organizational Research Methods 25 (1), 114-146, 2022 | 214 | 2022 |
| An overview and practical guide to IRT measurement equivalence analysis L Tay, AW Meade, M Cao Organizational Research Methods 18 (1), 3-46, 2015 | 188 | 2015 |
| Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations. M Cao, F Drasgow Journal of Applied Psychology 104 (11), 1347, 2019 | 159 | 2019 |
| An investigation of emotional intelligence measures using item response theory. S Cho, F Drasgow, M Cao Psychological assessment 27 (4), 1241, 2015 | 94 | 2015 |
| The factor structure of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS): An item-level exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) bifactor analysis. V Ng, M Cao, HW Marsh, L Tay, MEP Seligman Psychological assessment 29 (8), 1053, 2017 | 91 | 2017 |
| Using bifactor models to examine the predictive validity of hierarchical constructs: Pros, cons, and solutions B Zhang, T Sun, M Cao, F Drasgow Organizational Research Methods 24 (3), 530-571, 2021 | 60 | 2021 |
| Developing ideal intermediate personality items for the ideal point model M Cao, F Drasgow, S Cho Organizational Research Methods 18 (2), 252-275, 2015 | 56 | 2015 |
| The stressful personality: A meta-analytical review of the relation between personality and stress J Luo, B Zhang, M Cao, BW Roberts Personality and social psychology review 27 (2), 128-194, 2023 | 49 | 2023 |
| Development of an O* NET® Mini Interest Profiler (Mini-IP) for Mobile Devices: Psychometric Characteristics J Rounds, CWJ Ming, M Cao, C Song, P Lewis | 37 | 2016 |
| A Monte Carlo study of an iterative Wald test procedure for DIF analysis M Cao, L Tay, Y Liu Educational and psychological measurement 77 (1), 104-118, 2017 | 27 | 2017 |
| Small but nontrivial: A comparison of six strategies to handle cross-loadings in bifactor predictive models B Zhang, J Luo, T Sun, M Cao, F Drasgow Multivariate Behavioral Research 58 (1), 115-132, 2023 | 26 | 2023 |
| Faking detection improved: Adopting a Likert item response process tree model T Sun, B Zhang, M Cao, F Drasgow Organizational Research Methods 25 (3), 490-512, 2022 | 19 | 2022 |
| Examining the item response process to personality measures in high‐stakes situations: Issues of measurement validity and predictive validity B Zhang, M Cao, L Tay, J Luo, F Drasgow Personnel Psychology 73 (2), 305-332, 2020 | 18 | 2020 |
| Detecting curvilinear relationships: A comparison of scoring approaches based on different item response models M Cao, QC Song, L Tay International Journal of Testing 18 (2), 178-205, 2018 | 12 | 2018 |
| Examining the fakability of forced-choice individual differences measures M Cao | 10 | 2016 |
| Accounting for item response process and response styles using the Unfolding Item Response Tree (UIRTree) Model Z Li, B Zhang, M Cao, L Tay OSF, 2021 | 3 | 2021 |
| Developing ideal intermediate items for the ideal point model M Cao University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013 | | 2013 |
Louis TayWilliam C. Byham Professor of Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Purdue UniversityVerified email at purdue.edu
