Rachel Searston
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Contextual bias and cross-contamination in the forensic sciences: the corrosive implications for investigations, plea bargains, trials and appeals
G Edmond, JM Tangen, RA Searston, IE Dror
Law, Probability and Risk 14 (1), 1-25, 2015
602015
Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners
G Edmond, A Towler, B Growns, G Ribeiro, B Found, D White, ...
Science & Justice 57 (2), 144-154, 2017
542017
Model forensic science
G Edmond, B Found, K Martire, K Ballantyne, D Hamer, R Searston, ...
Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 48 (5), 496-537, 2016
492016
How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers
G Edmond, K Martire, R Kemp, D Hamer, B Hibbert, A Ligertwood, ...
Australian Bar Review 39 (2), 174-179, 2014
422014
Putting bias into context: The role of familiarity in identification.
RA Searston, JM Tangen, KW Eva
Law and Human Behavior 40 (1), 50, 2016
272016
The Emergence of Perceptual Expertise with Fingerprints Over Time
RA Searston, JM Tangen
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2017
232017
Are Forensic Scientists Experts?
A Towler, D White, K Ballantyne, RA Searston, KA Matire, RI Kemp
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 7 (2), 199—208, 2018
222018
Expertise with unfamiliar objects is flexible to changes in task but not changes in class
RA Searston, JM Tangen
PLoS ONE 12 (6), e0178403, 2017
212017
The style of a stranger: Identification expertise generalizes to coarser level categories
RA Searston, JM Tangen
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2016
192016
Understanding expertise and non-analytic cognition in fingerprint discriminations made by humans
MB Thompson, JM Tangen, RA Searston
Frontiers in psychology 5, 737, 2014
112014
Collective Intelligence in Fingerprint Analysis
JM Tangen, K Kent, RA Searston
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2020
72020
The Legal and Scientific Challenge of Black Box Expertise
R Searston, J Chin
University of Queensland Law Journal 38 (2), 2019
62019
Training perceptual experts: Feedback, labels, and contrasts.
RA Searston, JM Tangen
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1), 2017
52017
Truth and transparency in expertise research
RA Searston, MB Thompson, SG Robson, BJ Corbett, G Ribeiro, ...
Journal of Expertise 2 (4), 199-209, 2019
42019
How low can you go? Detecting style in extremely low resolution images
RA Searston, MB Thompson, JR Vokey, LA French, JM Tangen
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2019
42019
How low can you go? Detecting style in extremely low resolution images
RA Searston, MB Thompson, JR Vokey, L French, JM Tangen
PsyArXiv: https://psyarxiv.com/zx2gs, 2018
42018
An expert-novice comparison of feature choice
SG Robson, RA Searston, G Edmond, D McCarthy, JM Tangen
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2020
32020
Kristy Martire, Richard Kemp, David Hamer, Brynn Hibbert, Andrew Ligertwood, Glenn Porter, Mehera San Roque, Rachel Searston, Jason Tangen, Matthew Thompson and David White …
G Edmond
Australian Bar Review 39, 174, 0
2
Nudging Open Science
SG Robson, MA Baum, JL Beaudry, J Beitner, H Brohmer, J Chin, K Jasko, ...
PsyArXiv, 2021
12021
An evidence accumulation model of perceptual discrimination with naturalistic stimuli
H Palada*, RA Searston*, A Persson, T Ballard**, MB Thompson**
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2020
12020
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20